Control orders

7Modification, notification and proof of orders etc.

1

If while a non-derogating control order is in force the controlled person considers that there has been a change of circumstances affecting the order, he may make an application to the Secretary of State for—

a

the revocation of the order; or

b

the modification of an obligation imposed by the order;

and it shall be the duty of the Secretary of State to consider the application.

2

The Secretary of State may, at any time (whether or not in response to an application by the controlled person)—

a

revoke a non-derogating control order;

b

relax or remove an obligation imposed by such an order;

c

with the consent of the controlled person, modify the obligations imposed by such an order; or

d

make to the obligations imposed by such an order any modifications which he considers necessary for purposes connected with preventing or restricting involvement by the controlled person in terrorism-related activity.

3

The Secretary of State may not make to the obligations imposed by a control order any modification the effect of which is that a non-derogating control order becomes an order imposing a derogating obligation.

4

An application may be made at any time to the court—

a

by the Secretary of State, or

b

by the controlled person,

for the revocation of a derogating control order or for the modification of obligations imposed by such an order.

5

On such an application, the court may modify the obligations imposed by the derogating control order only where—

a

the modification consists in the removal or relaxation of an obligation imposed by the order;

b

the modification has been agreed to by both the controlled person and the Secretary of State; or

c

the modification is one which the court considers necessary for purposes connected with preventing or restricting involvement by the controlled person in terrorism-related activity.

6

The court may not, by any modification of the obligations imposed by a derogating control order, impose any derogating obligation unless—

a

it considers that the modification is necessary for purposes connected with protecting members of the public from a risk of terrorism; and

b

it appears to the court that the risk is one arising out of, or is associated with, the public emergency in respect of which the designated derogation in question has effect.

7

If the court at any time determines that a derogating control order needs to be modified so that it no longer imposes derogating obligations, it must revoke the order.

8

The controlled person is bound by—

a

a control order,

b

the renewal of a control order, or

c

a modification by virtue of subsection (2)(d) or (5)(c),

only if a notice setting out the terms of the order, renewal or modification has been delivered to him in person.

9

For the purpose of delivering a notice under subsection (8) to the controlled person a constable or a person authorised for the purpose by the Secretary of State may (if necessary by force)—

a

enter any premises where he has reasonable grounds for believing that person to be; and

b

search those premises for him.

10

Where the Secretary of State revokes a control order or modifies it by virtue of subsection (2)(b) or (c)—

a

he must give notice of the revocation or modification to the controlled person; and

b

the notice must set out the time from which the revocation or modification takes effect.

11

A control order, or the renewal, revocation or modification of such an order, may be proved by the production of a document purporting to be certified by the Secretary of State or the court as a true copy of—

a

the order; or

b

the instrument of renewal, revocation or modification;

but this does not prevent the proof of a control order, or of the renewal, revocation or modification of such an order, in other ways.