6After section 39 insert—
(1)This section applies if—
(a)a person (“P”) becomes subject to Schedule A1, and
(b)the managing authority of the relevant hospital or care home are satisfied that there is no person, other than one engaged in providing care or treatment for P in a professional capacity or for remuneration, whom it would be appropriate to consult in determining what would be in P’s best interests.
(2)The managing authority must notify the supervisory body that this section applies.
(3)The supervisory body must instruct an independent mental capacity advocate to represent P.
(4)Schedule A1 makes provision about the role of an independent mental capacity advocate appointed under this section.
(5)This section is subject to paragraph 161 of Schedule A1.
(6)For the purposes of subsection (1), a person appointed under Part 10 of Schedule A1 to be P’s representative is not, by virtue of that appointment, engaged in providing care or treatment for P in a professional capacity or for remuneration.
(1)This section applies for the purposes of section 39A.
(2)P becomes subject to Schedule A1 in any of the following cases.
(3)The first case is where an urgent authorisation is given in relation to P under paragraph 76(2) of Schedule A1 (urgent authorisation given before request made for standard authorisation).
(4)The second case is where the following conditions are met.
(5)The first condition is that a request is made under Schedule A1 for a standard authorisation to be given in relation to P (“the requested authorisation”).
(6)The second condition is that no urgent authorisation was given under paragraph 76(2) of Schedule A1 before that request was made.
(7)The third condition is that the requested authorisation will not be in force on or before, or immediately after, the expiry of an existing standard authorisation.
(8)The expiry of a standard authorisation is the date when the authorisation is expected to cease to be in force.
(9)The third case is where, under paragraph 69 of Schedule A1, the supervisory body select a person to carry out an assessment of whether or not the relevant person is a detained resident.
(1)This section applies if—
(a)an authorisation under Schedule A1 is in force in relation to a person (“P”),
(b)the appointment of a person as P’s representative ends in accordance with regulations made under Part 10 of Schedule A1, and
(c)the managing authority of the relevant hospital or care home are satisfied that there is no person, other than one engaged in providing care or treatment for P in a professional capacity or for remuneration, whom it would be appropriate to consult in determining what would be in P’s best interests.
(2)The managing authority must notify the supervisory body that this section applies.
(3)The supervisory body must instruct an independent mental capacity advocate to represent P.
(4)Paragraph 159 of Schedule A1 makes provision about the role of an independent mental capacity advocate appointed under this section.
(5)The appointment of an independent mental capacity advocate under this section ends when a new appointment of a person as P’s representative is made in accordance with Part 10 of Schedule A1.
(6)For the purposes of subsection (1), a person appointed under Part 10 of Schedule A1 to be P’s representative is not, by virtue of that appointment, engaged in providing care or treatment for P in a professional capacity or for remuneration.
(1)This section applies if—
(a)an authorisation under Schedule A1 is in force in relation to a person (“P”),
(b)P has a representative (“R”) appointed under Part 10 of Schedule A1, and
(c)R is not being paid under regulations under Part 10 of Schedule A1 for acting as P’s representative.
(2)The supervisory body must instruct an independent mental capacity advocate to represent P in any of the following cases.
(3)The first case is where P makes a request to the supervisory body to instruct an advocate.
(4)The second case is where R makes a request to the supervisory body to instruct an advocate.
(5)The third case is where the supervisory body have reason to believe one or more of the following—
(a)that, without the help of an advocate, P and R would be unable to exercise one or both of the relevant rights;
(b)that P and R have each failed to exercise a relevant right when it would have been reasonable to exercise it;
(c)that P and R are each unlikely to exercise a relevant right when it would be reasonable to exercise it.
(6)The duty in subsection (2) is subject to section 39E.
(7)If an advocate is appointed under this section, the advocate is, in particular, to take such steps as are practicable to help P and R to understand the following matters—
(a)the effect of the authorisation;
(b)the purpose of the authorisation;
(c)the duration of the authorisation;
(d)any conditions to which the authorisation is subject;
(e)the reasons why each assessor who carried out an assessment in connection with the request for the authorisation, or in connection with a review of the authorisation, decided that P met the qualifying requirement in question;
(f)the relevant rights;
(g)how to exercise the relevant rights.
(8)The advocate is, in particular, to take such steps as are practicable to help P or R—
(a)to exercise the right to apply to court, if it appears to the advocate that P or R wishes to exercise that right, or
(b)to exercise the right of review, if it appears to the advocate that P or R wishes to exercise that right.
(9)If the advocate helps P or R to exercise the right of review—
(a)the advocate may make submissions to the supervisory body on the question of whether a qualifying requirement is reviewable;
(b)the advocate may give information, or make submissions, to any assessor carrying out a review assessment.
(10)In this section—
“relevant rights” means—
the right to apply to court, and
the right of review;
“right to apply to court” means the right to make an application to the court to exercise its jurisdiction under section 21A;
“right of review” means the right under Part 8 of Schedule A1 to request a review.
(1)This section applies if an advocate is already representing P in accordance with an instruction under section 39D.
(2)Section 39D(2) does not require another advocate to be instructed, unless the following conditions are met.
(3)The first condition is that the existing advocate was instructed—
(a)because of a request by R, or
(b)because the supervisory body had reason to believe one or more of the things in section 39D(5).
(4)The second condition is that the other advocate would be instructed because of a request by P.”