xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

Relevant duty of careU.K.

2Meaning of “relevant duty of care”U.K.

(1)A “relevant duty of care”, in relation to an organisation, means any of the following duties owed by it under the law of negligence—

(a)a duty owed to its employees or to other persons working for the organisation or performing services for it;

(b)a duty owed as occupier of premises;

(c)a duty owed in connection with—

(i)the supply by the organisation of goods or services (whether for consideration or not),

(ii)the carrying on by the organisation of any construction or maintenance operations,

(iii)the carrying on by the organisation of any other activity on a commercial basis, or

(iv)the use or keeping by the organisation of any plant, vehicle or other thing;

(d)a duty owed to a person who, by reason of being a person within subsection (2), is someone for whose safety the organisation is responsible.

(2)A person is within this subsection if—

(a)he is detained at a custodial institution or in a custody area at a court[F1, a police station or customs premises];

[F2(aa)he is detained in service custody premises;]

(b)he is detained at a removal centre[F3, a short-term holding facility or in pre-departure accommodation];

(c)he is being transported in a vehicle, or being held in any premises, in pursuance of prison escort arrangements or immigration escort arrangements;

(d)he is living in secure accommodation in which he has been placed;

(e)he is a detained patient.

(3)Subsection (1) is subject to sections 3 to 7.

(4)A reference in subsection (1) to a duty owed under the law of negligence includes a reference to a duty that would be owed under the law of negligence but for any statutory provision under which liability is imposed in place of liability under that law.

(5)For the purposes of this Act, whether a particular organisation owes a duty of care to a particular individual is a question of law.

The judge must make any findings of fact necessary to decide that question.

(6)For the purposes of this Act there is to be disregarded—

(a)any rule of the common law that has the effect of preventing a duty of care from being owed by one person to another by reason of the fact that they are jointly engaged in unlawful conduct;

(b)any such rule that has the effect of preventing a duty of care from being owed to a person by reason of his acceptance of a risk of harm.

(7)In this section—

Textual Amendments

F3Words in s. 2(2)(b) substituted (28.7.2014) by Immigration Act 2014 (c. 22), s. 75(3), Sch. 9 para. 15(a); S.I. 2014/1820, art. 3(cc)

Commencement Information

I1S. 2(1)(a)-(c) (3)-(7) in force at 6.4.2008 by S.I. 2008/401, art. 2 (with art. 2(3)(b))

I2S. 2(1)(d) in force at 1.9.2011 for E.W.S. by S.I. 2011/1867, art. 2

I3S. 2(1)(d) in force at 3.9.2012 for N.I. by S.R. 2012/286, art. 2